DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 09270-13
28 July 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To; Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD OF (y
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his
record reflect the reentry code of RE-3G (condition, not
disability) vice RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) in
block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty) issued on 7 December 1999.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms.
Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 23 July 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, and
enclosures (1) through (3). ,
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:
a. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 31 August 1998. Oni
November 1999, a mental health evaluation was conducted and he ©
disclosed that he had a life-long history of panic attacks with
tightening in his chest and shortness of breath while wearing
head-gear. He was. diagnosed with phobia (claustrophobia) which
existed prior to enlistment (EPTE) and was recommended for
administrative separation. On 1 December 1999, he signed and
acknowledged that he was being assigned an RE-3 reentry code
upon his separation. However, on 7 December 1999, he received
an honorable characterization of service and was assigned an RE-
4 reentry code. Petitioner was eligible to be assigned an RE-3G
reentry code.
CONCLUSION;
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that it was an error to.assign a reentry code of
RE-4. In this case ig view of his overall record, Petitioner
should have been assigned an RE-3G reentry code.
Accordingly, the Board finds the existence of an error
warranting the following corrective action. |
RECOMMENDATION ;
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he received a “RE-3G” vice “RE-4" reentry code on 7 December
1999,
b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in his
record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board‘’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE
' Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby ©
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN -
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0533 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent entry into military service (other)) and the RE-4 reentry code issued on 17 February 2009, be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Ms. Lapinski, and Mr. Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice © on 12 March 2014, and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1655 14
The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Ms. Polk, and Mr. Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 2 September 2004, she was assigned an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 reentry code. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE Recorder Acting Recorder S. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6862 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, to change his reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for retention). The Board, consisting of Ms. Henkel and Messrs. Rothlein and Zsalman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 23 July 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that relief should be granted. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6960 13
He was then recommended for administrative separation due to his diagnosed personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner’s reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 9 April 2008, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8153 13
gM reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. She received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 25 March 2011, with an RE-4 reentry code (not recommended for retention). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she received a reentry code of “RE-3G” vice “RE-4".
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11884 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and particularly in light of the Army orthopedic surgeon’s diagnosis, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner's reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 8 January 2014, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05010-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 reentry code be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Gattis, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Although Petitioner was properly...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03492-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 3492-11 30 January 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ia OF NAVAL RECORD OF ess Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Pfeiffer and Mr. Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 January 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3780 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting: that his RE-4 {not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Grover, Mr. Rothleim, and Mr. Clemmons, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and ‘injustice on 10 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...